skip to main
|
skip to sidebar
Pages
Home
Corporate Lawyer
General Corporate Lawyer
Daiichi Sankyo - Ranbaxy
June 13 edition of
Mint
carried my column on how Daiichi Sankyo - Ranbaxy deal vindicates Indian IPR regime. Check the following link:
http://www.livemint.com/2008/06/13001424/Daiichi-Sankyo-vindicates-Indi.html
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
Popular Posts
AIF Regulations: Meaning of Ownership Interests and Investor Interests in a Company – Part II
[The following post is part of the series contributed by Vinod Kothari and Soma Bagaria . The authors can be reached at vinod@vinodkothari.c...
FDI in NBFC Sector Relaxed
Foreign direct investment (FDI) in non-banking finance companies (NBFCs) has been subject to minimum capitalisation norms. For example...
Front-running is no crime, says SAT
The Securities Appellate Tribunal has given an interesting ruling that front running by an investor (who is not an intermediary) is not a v...
AIF Regulations: Meaning of Ownership Interests and Investor Interests in a Company – Part III
[The following post is the last of the series contributed by Vinod Kothari and Soma Bagaria . The authors can be reached at vinod@vinodkotha...
Companies Bill Back on the Anvil
In July this year, the Standing Committee on Finance presented its report on the Companies Bill, 2011 suggesting some changes. T...
Indemnity clauses and criminal proceedings
Earlier this week, the Court of Appeal decided another interesting case involving contractual interpretation – this time interpreting and de...
Rajat Gupta’s Sentencing Order
The order of the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, sentencing Rajat Gupta to 2 years’ imprisonment an...
Call for Papers: Indian Journal of Arbitration Law
[The following announcement comes from the Indian Journal of Arbitration Law] The Indian Journal of Arbitration Law is the flagship journal ...
How final are Consent Orders? Can further action be taken even for settled matters?
SEBI’s Order in case of Arun Jain debarring him for 2 years for insider trading is a little disturbing. It questions the perceived san...
Executive Compensation and Corporate Governance
Although the issue of executive compensation has not been as dominant in the corporate governance discourse in India as it has been in other...
Powered by
Blogger
.
Blog Archive
►
2013
(12)
►
January
(12)
►
2012
(193)
►
December
(20)
►
November
(15)
►
October
(17)
►
September
(12)
►
August
(16)
►
July
(14)
►
June
(17)
►
May
(13)
►
April
(21)
►
March
(17)
►
February
(12)
►
January
(19)
►
2011
(194)
►
December
(18)
►
November
(19)
►
October
(9)
►
September
(12)
►
August
(22)
►
July
(16)
►
June
(13)
►
May
(15)
►
April
(21)
►
March
(14)
►
February
(22)
►
January
(13)
►
2010
(101)
►
December
(15)
►
November
(16)
►
October
(14)
►
September
(32)
►
August
(24)
▼
2008
(151)
►
July
(8)
▼
June
(12)
The Impending FCCB Conundrum
Differential Voting Rights: Some Further References
Research Paper: Achieving India’s Growth Potential
Creating Debt and Securitisation Markets in India
CSX/TCI Judgment – Some Thoughts on the SEBI Takeo...
Daiichi Sankyo - Ranbaxy
Top Law Schools
Oil Price Rise: Shareholders vs. Consumers
The Proper Purpose of a Corporation
FDI: Reporting Under Automatic Route
Differential Voting Rights: A Markets Perspective
India Today: Law School Rankings
►
May
(28)
►
April
(22)
►
March
(31)
►
February
(21)
►
January
(29)
►
2007
(8)
►
December
(8)