skip to main
|
skip to sidebar
Pages
Home
Corporate Lawyer
General Corporate Lawyer
Daiichi Sankyo - Ranbaxy
June 13 edition of
Mint
carried my column on how Daiichi Sankyo - Ranbaxy deal vindicates Indian IPR regime. Check the following link:
http://www.livemint.com/2008/06/13001424/Daiichi-Sankyo-vindicates-Indi.html
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
Popular Posts
Company Information in India
The Harvard Business School (HBS) Working Knowledge carries an interview of Professor Tarun Khanna of HBS in connection with the release o...
Ostensible Authority and Estoppel
The Privy Council in Kelly v. Fraser , [2012] UKPC 25, recently revisited the issue of whether an agent can be said to have ostensible autho...
Inter Se Promoter Exemption for Takeovers: Computation of Holding Period
A few days ago, SEBI made public its informal guidance issued to Weizmann Forex Ltd. on October 25, 2012. In this case, the tar...
The Implied Authority of a Managing Director
Does a managing director have implied authority to suspend the Chairman of the board of directors? This is a question the Court of Appeal co...
Part II - An Analysis of the Supreme Court’s judgment in Vodafone
In our first post on the Vodafone judgment , we set out the issues of law arising from the Court’s findings, and discussed two of those – t...
Managerial Remuneration in Unlisted Companies: Process Eased
When the rest of the world is tightening the screws on payment of managerial remuneration in the wake of the financial crisis, the Ministry ...
Legal advice privilege for tax advice given by non-lawyers
One of the striking changes in professional advice over the last two or more decades is the gradual erosion of the monopoly which members of...
Strict Liability and the Nature of the Rule in Rylands v Fletcher
It is perhaps not surprising that counsel could not find a reported case since the second world war in which anyone had succeeded in a claim...
SEBI Investment Advisers Regulations – an overkill?
In continuation with earlier post on the recently notified SEBI(Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013 (“the Regulations”), the follo...
FDI: Reporting Under Automatic Route
Whenever foreign investors subscribe to an issue of shares by an Indian company, there are certain reporting requirements that need to be co...
Powered by
Blogger
.
Blog Archive
►
2013
(12)
►
January
(12)
►
2012
(193)
►
December
(20)
►
November
(15)
►
October
(17)
►
September
(12)
►
August
(16)
►
July
(14)
►
June
(17)
►
May
(13)
►
April
(21)
►
March
(17)
►
February
(12)
►
January
(19)
►
2011
(194)
►
December
(18)
►
November
(19)
►
October
(9)
►
September
(12)
►
August
(22)
►
July
(16)
►
June
(13)
►
May
(15)
►
April
(21)
►
March
(14)
►
February
(22)
►
January
(13)
►
2010
(101)
►
December
(15)
►
November
(16)
►
October
(14)
►
September
(32)
►
August
(24)
▼
2008
(151)
►
July
(8)
▼
June
(12)
The Impending FCCB Conundrum
Differential Voting Rights: Some Further References
Research Paper: Achieving India’s Growth Potential
Creating Debt and Securitisation Markets in India
CSX/TCI Judgment – Some Thoughts on the SEBI Takeo...
Daiichi Sankyo - Ranbaxy
Top Law Schools
Oil Price Rise: Shareholders vs. Consumers
The Proper Purpose of a Corporation
FDI: Reporting Under Automatic Route
Differential Voting Rights: A Markets Perspective
India Today: Law School Rankings
►
May
(28)
►
April
(22)
►
March
(31)
►
February
(21)
►
January
(29)
►
2007
(8)
►
December
(8)